News

| Submit Comments | View Comments (17)
James Arbuthnot, MP for North East Hampshire, and Aldershot MP Gerald Howarth
James Arbuthnot, MP for North East Hampshire, and Aldershot MP Gerald Howarth
advertisement

Taxpayers foot £1m bill for Arbuthnot and Howarth


June 18, 2009

TAXPAYERS footed an expenses bill of more than £1m for MPs across the Get Hampshire area between 2004 and 2008.

The revelations come as all members’ claims for the period have been published in full - albeit heavily edited - on the Parliamentary website

The data contains edited scans of documents submitted in support of claims made against the Additional Costs Allowance – which is paid to reimburse members for costs incurred when staying overnight away from their main home.

The costs associated with running an office and fees for communicating with constituents are also listed.

The total expenses bill for North East Hampshire MP James Arbuthnot and Gerald Howarth, MP for Aldershot, was £1,067,128 between 2004/05 and 2007/08.

James Arbuthnot

It cost taxpayers £3,030 to feed North East Hampshire MP James Arbuthnot in 2007.

The MP claimed his full food allowance of £400 for seven months out of 12 in 2007, while public money to the tune of £2,433 went towards his housekeeper.

In total, Mr Arbuthnot claimed £146,192 in expenses, on top of his £64,766 salary in 2006/07. 

The MP, who bought his £2m home in Stratfield Mortimer without a mortgage in 2007, also pulls in an income from the rental of his two London flats.

Some of the details of his expenses were already known because the MP was named and shamed in the Daily Telegraph on May 11, but his constituents can now see the figures in more detail.

Named and shamed

Addresses, security information and various other details have been blacked out by Parliamentary officials.

In May, Mr Arbuthnot, a millionaire second son of a baronet, came under fire for charging the taxpayer for the servicing of his swimming pool.

After the revelations, he apologised and agreed to pay back the costs.

But he also submitted expenses for a number of smaller items which did not make it into the public domain until now.

In October 2007, he spent £183.39 purchasing a chainsaw to chop up logs and £25.82 on vases.

In August 2007, he spent £428.30 hiring an electrician to, among other things, change four lights.

Regret

Mr Arbuthnot said in a statement: "The only way to begin regaining the public’s trust and to rebuild the bond between constituents and their Member of Parliament is to ensure that all expense claims are entirely fair, appropriate and within the spirit of House of Commons guidelines and what our constituents expect.

"I have already said that I am sorry for the error of judgement that I made in submitting expense claims for the maintenance of the swimming pool at my constituency home and I have repaid the total claimed in full, but now I want the constituents of North East Hampshire to know that I am doing all that I can to regain their trust."

Gerald Howarth

Taxpayers spent more than £55,000 in the last four years paying off Mr Howarth’s mortgage on his second home.

They also spent £4,475 feeding the Conservative MP and paid his council tax and phone and cable television bills amounting to £5,561.98 and £2,867 respectively.

Dating between 2004 and 2008, they relate to Mr Howarth’s Farnborough property, which he took a £260,000 mortgage out on.

Although it falls within his Aldershot, Farnborough and Yateley constituency, it is classed as his second home as he lives in London.

The records show that in 2004, Mr Howarth charged the taxpayer £1,144 for work carried out at his second home by a gardener, along with £161 for a barbecue and garden chairs.

He also moved household items into storage, pending the start of construction work on an extension to the house, to the tune of £1,983.

Curtains

After being re-elected to his seat in May 2005, Mr Howarth had Medici Chintz curtains made-to-order for his Farnborough house at a cost of £726.

He also purchased a £190 chest freezer, a £370 fridge-freezer, a £370 washing machine and a £330 bed featuring an Albany Oyster Damask headboard – all paid for by taxpayers.

The bill for repair work at his Farnborough house came to £240 and lighting and kitchen accessories cost £115.

In 2006 he spent £197 on tools and shelving, £40 on a garden strimmer and another £40 on bathroom accessories.

The same year the extension to the property was completed.

Although Mr Howarth paid for the work out of his own pocket, he left taxpayers to pick up a bill for £1,428 for the repointing of existing walls, which included applying emulsion and undercoat and glossing the woodwork in the hallway, landing and utility room.

By comparison, the politician’s expenses in 2007 were much less.

Three phone handsets cost £60 and two chrome showerheads, including an ex-display model at a reduced price, were bought for £92. He also bought a coffee table for £229.

Hand-made sofa

In an interview with the News & Mail last month, Mr Howarth referred to a sofa he bought in April 2007 and claimed back on expenses.

He said he bought the sofa in a clearance sale at Bentalls in Hawley Lane, Farnborough, and that it did not cost the taxpayer a lot.

However, a receipt included among the MPs expenses reveal that it was a handmade sofa costing £675.

In total, Mr Howarth claimed £531,290 in expenses on top of his annual £64,766 salary during the four years.

This included communication costs and the expense of running an office.

Under these allowances Mr Howarth claimed £38 in December 2007 for official House of Commons Christmas cards featuring Big Ben and Westminster Abbey.

A Who’s Who Wittaker’s Almanac for £129, a night in a hotel costing £140.40, including £1.40 for a newspaper, and an Armed forces guide purchased for £10 were some of the smaller items.

Taxpayers were charged £24,298.74 to pay for Mr Howarth’s research and £5,916.79 maintaining his website and email account.

Mr Howarth was unavailable for comment.

| Submit Comments | View Comments (17)

Most recent user comments 15 of 17

1 | 2 | Next Page Show 15 | 25 | 50 per page

   Mr Keens, we are going to have to agree to disagree, your last comment has gone off on a tangent slightly? You argued on behalf of your MP, defending him by stating that the Commons expense system was a perk and because of the abysmal salary paid, MPs had a right to exploit the system. I simply gave you example of other public servants that I have direct personal experience of "Armed Forces" & "Emergency Services", and all of the people I served with did both jobs so for noble reasons including my fellow 18 - 20yr old troopers. To dismiss the comparison was a littleninsulting, however, I still feel both are public servants, both paid from the public purse ............... yes MPs do not risk life or limb but they are comparable as public servants. And I am not "Swept Up" in the emotions of the press, I have spent hours looking at the facts behind the headlines, hence my FACTS not emotion. This has nothing to to with "other countries" and "Freedom of Speech"? This has to do with our public servants being caught out exploiting a system. If you are happy to vote for "your MP" again, that is your choice. I am not, and therefore have decided to get more involved in the political process now and look to ensure my next MP represents my Vision and Values.

What is great though, is the fact there are some of us who are willing to comment and debate on the subject in this format. It is just a shame that more do not do so.

North Camp 999, North Camp
26/06/2009 at 13:54 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   Dear Mr Northcamp 999,

I have worked in over 35 different organisations and in a number of different professions. I have also worked as a management accountant in both public service and the private sector and I am well aware of the huge differences in the structures of the various accounting and expensing systems.

You attempt to compare the system of the House of Commons with that of the army and other organisations, but the fact is they are INCOMPARABLE - the parliamentary system is simply not THAT kind of system. As mentioned in my previous comment, no one can deny that the expense system of the House of Commons was 'Yes Ministerish' in its format, but that is NOT the fault of either James Arbuthnot or Gerald Howarth, nor ANY OTHER MP for that matter. The parliamentary expense system was simply very outdated and should have been changed long ago, but again that was not the responsibility of James Arbuthnot or Gerald Howarth. And unfortunately there isn't a profession in the UK which is comparable to that of the Member of Parliament, so there was no impetus for anyone to attempt to change it. Furthermore, I'm sure that all of us have observed how ridiculously slow-moving changes are made to the legal and finance system in the UK.

And as for your comment about the Conservatives forcing Mr Arbuthnot to pay back his expenses. Well all I can say is that political parties will sell their own grandmothers to garner a few votes, so their actions mean precisely NOTHING. They are fair weather when all is said and done. I vote Arbuthnot because he is good MP, not because he is a Tory.

It is very fortunate that some of us can think independently as just because a nation is carried away with hysteria over a particular notion, it doesn't mean to say that it is correct - a fact which was painfully proved by the events of Nazi Germany.

And on that note, I should say that we should be thankful to be able to have this discussion because many citizens abroad are not afforded this luxury. Thankfully, you are entitled to your opinion and I'm entitled to mine. Have a nice day.

M Keens, Fleet
25/06/2009 at 21:12 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   M Keens, you are defending this man using the excuse that £65K is an abysmal amount !?.......... yes it may be, but he knew the wage when he stood for public service. I worked in the emergency services, and yes the wages are low compared to what I earn in the private sector, but that does not mean that I would abuse the County expenses system (If I did, it would be an instant criminal offence, unlike the House of Commons. Our soldiers are paid an abysmal wage, but they knew that when they joined, you will not find the guys and girls in uniform looting in a war zone because the wages are abysmal! And as an "Executive Headhunter" you will know that we look for people with core Values & Vision in order to lead those people that they serve or manage. Read through the expenses claims as I did, as a matter of respect in light of your comments, yes he may have helped you but that does not give any man in that position the right to then abuse the system. And the expenses system was not a PERK, it was put in place to ensure that MPs could make claims that were directly attributed to their job. Sorry, servicing the Aga, Swimming Pool, Double Glazing etc, etc does not come under that description. And it is because of MP's like this that the system failed ............ HE WAS NOT ACTING WITHIN THE RULES as you state. Unfortunately, the conservative party would appear to disagree with you and have ordered that James Arbuthnot repay almost £10,000 today for household and swimming pool maintenance, of which there was more than one claim. So the excuse I made a one off mistake does not work on this occasion. If any reader has ANY doubts, read the expense claims that are available on the Parliament website, do not just depend on a newspaper report. I do not think the "Scrutiny" team went far enough. And if this man will not stand down, vote for someone else. Mr Keens, If any other person in public office was to make such an error of judgment, they too would be "Hung, Drawn & Quartered" as you described it.
North Camp 999, North Camp
25/06/2009 at 16:39 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   Nobody can dispute the 'facts' as it were but what is more important is to put those 'facts' in context. I do not earn anywhere near as much as 65K, but I have worked in headhunting and the FACT is that this salary is abysmal for the job an MP undertakes and the range of abilities required for the role which not only includes being a great social worker but also involves potentially helping lead a country into and out of a world war. The expense system which was admittedly redolent of something out of 'Yes Minister' was a perk of the job in which MPs naturally partook, like most people would in the circumstances. Admittedly there were some who completely abused the system by pretending they had second homes and the like, but James Arbuthnot and Gerald Howarth do not form part of that category. As far as they were concerned, they were simply acting within the rules. 65K plus the expense system ensured that parliament attracted MPs from all professions and statuses to provide a balanced backbone of power in the country. Those who decided a 65K salary with an expense system over which many innocent MPs have now been to be practically hung, drawn and quartered, should be the ones to be punished. Based on my executive search experience, the salary should have been a 100K base and no or minimal expenses. I should also mention that I am an ex-carer saved from the terror of eviction by James Arbuthnot's swift action and I naturally have a great deal to thank him for. There are many, many other people out there in the same boat who have benefitted from the prompt action of Mr Arbuthnot in these and other terrifying life situations. And when you look at the comments going back to the beginning of the crisis, you will see that no one has criticised Mr Arbuthnot's service, have they? They have only had praise for it. I urge, therefore, that people out there consider what it is good for THEM and that is to keep Mr Arbuthnot as our MP.
M Keens, Fleet
25/06/2009 at 14:02 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   Totally agree with the person below. Some of you should also read both these MPs websites and it will show the work that they use to do? - when they went in to being a MP and being paid by all of us in the public eye. What I don't understand is why does Howarth have a second home he spends most of his time in his home in London and only comes to his Farnborough Home at weekends. As the second home is being paid for by the Tax payer then these permises should be sold when Howarth is no longer a MP to put the money back to the tax payer - he should not beallowed to make money from us. all second homes should be given back to the tax payer and not the MP. You should read the following page:- http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2048996_mps_expenses_in_the_spotlightand also following page:-http://www.gethampshire.co.uk/news/s/2050905_mp_meets_expenses_row_with_defiance. I think Howarth should stand down now!
Aldershot Born
25/06/2009 at 10:26 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   Supporters of Fleet, in order to be fair to you, I spent a couple of hours reading through your MP James Arbuthnot expense claims (have you done that yet?) If you are happy with your MP claiming £85 on teaspoons, £500 on a laptop warranty!? £306 on a Swimming Pool service (why is that needed for duties as an MP?), Gas Bill for £2292 (yes over £2000!) I would also check out the monthly charges for repairs and service on your MP's home............. because the monthly amounts claimed are in some cases over £2000 a month! Is his house in such a poor state of repair? £720 on a TV for his second home? £340 to service his Aga, £791 for pool and garden service, unspecified repair on house with handwritten invoice for £1109, another unspecified repair on house with handwritten invoice for £1229, £810 for gardening services, £563 for the supply of plants. Sorry Fleet supporters but you really need to read through and question some of the claims recorded, above is just a tiny selection. I just could not believe how many home repairs / service were recorded. Yes our MP's may have done "Good" things for our area, but before you attack or defend on this subject spend sometime reading the facts.
North Camp 999, North Camp
25/06/2009 at 00:15 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   I don't see why it should be surprising that James Arbuthnot has so much support bearing in mind his excellent work locally. Word gets around when negative press is out there but not necessarily on the day of publication. Frankly, I find it very, very strange that you are commenting this......???Mmmmmmmmmmmmm.
M Keens, Fleet
24/06/2009 at 11:37 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   How strange, three positive comments from Fleet all on the same day (not the day the story was published) Mmmmmmm?
North Camp 999, North Camp
23/06/2009 at 20:35 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   Yes, what more can James Arbuthnot now do to make amends but offer himself to be stoned in either the car park behind M&S in Fleet or perhaps in the middle of Waitrose on Saturday morning? And perhaps those critics who've never committed a SINGLE transgression in their lifetimes could step forth and be the ones to cast the first stones?
Sue S, Fleet
23/06/2009 at 17:23 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   Another of our precious and courageous serviceman gets killed in Afghanistan and yet eyes are still fixated elsewhere on this national and now highly banal debate about MPs’ expenses. There really are much more important and pressing matters in the world such as Mothers losing sons, wives losing husbands and children losing Fathers. Short of having either a public flogging in the Harlington Centre or perhaps a crucifixion in Gurkha Square, I am not sure what else James Arbuthnot can do to make amends. He has done as much as he can.

In this instance, I think it is also worth reminding everyone about the splendid work James Arbuthnot undertakes for the forces and in particular, his tireless efforts for those with post-traumatic stress. These are things that REALLY count.

M Keens, Fleet
23/06/2009 at 13:13 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   James Arbuthnot has apologised, he has paid back expenses and also asked for all his other expenses to be reviewed.

What more can he do? Or would you like his head on a platter?
CS, Fleet
23/06/2009 at 10:39 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   A reminder: In total, Mr Howarth claimed £531,290 in expenses on top of his annual £64,766 salary during the four years. Much of this was claimed on a spurious second home. Is it posible to establsh where Howarth's main home really was? - Of course. We know that his main home is really in Farnborough. Prove otherwise Howarth. You can't.
Paul B
23/06/2009 at 05:47 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   These 2 disgraceful human beings should be made to stand down immediately.
Roy S
21/06/2009 at 11:09 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   Mr Howarth and mr Arbuthnot, you are both...extremely poor excuses for men and locally elected mp's. You should pay all monies back into the 'pot' whence they came immediately then put yourselves in stocks so all the good residents of the area can pelt you with rotten fruit and veg'. What you two have done has undermined the faith of your constituants and you will not be elected a further term, just collect your p45 on the way out and leave the district.
werf44
19/06/2009 at 15:19 Offensive or Inappropriate?
   Mr Howart your expenses are disgusting. If anyone else tried that in their job, they would get turned down.

You are an arrogant little man who does'nt deserve to represent this area.

Stand down!!!!!
AndyB, Aldershot
19/06/2009 at 09:50 Offensive or Inappropriate?
1 | 2 | Next Page Show 15 | 25 | 50 per page

Add Your Comments

Business Finder
 
 
Homes / Jobs Search
 
Jobs Homes

Brought to you by

Get the Job
Newsletter Sign Up
 
Sign up to the
weekly news
update


Submit
External links
 
Loading poll, please wait...